Modern NewsTopAskShowBestNew

New

Steering Zig Fmt

by surprisetalk · 1 minute ago

1|matklad.github.io|0 comments

W Social uncovered: the reality behind the hype

by nemoniac · 1 minute ago

1|blog.elenarossini.com|0 comments

Asami: A flexible graph store, written in Clojure

by tosh · 14 minutes ago

1|github.com|0 comments

Blockchain Expansion Slowing Down? Try Solana Solutions

by ishariya · 15 minutes ago

1|www.securitytokenizer.io|0 comments

'Dirty Frag' exploit leaks out, gives root on most Linux machines

by lschueller · 16 minutes ago

2|www.tomshardware.com|1 comments

Anomalies

by tosh · 17 minutes ago

1|github.com|0 comments

8-Ball Game in Browser

by hbi99 · 18 minutes ago

1|www.karaqu.com|0 comments

Elevated errors across Claude Models (May 8, 09:49 UTC)

by pramodbiligiri · 19 minutes ago

1|status.claude.com|0 comments

GeoJSON

by tosh · 20 minutes ago

4|geojson.org|0 comments

go-libghostty: Go bindings for libghostty-vt

by icy · 21 minutes ago

2|tangled.org|0 comments

Unique index failure on Postgres – my bad

by robshep · 21 minutes ago

I recently had a unique index failure on PostgreSQL. To be clear it wasn't Postgres' fault - it was mine.

Thankfully it reared it's head on Staging not Live, but here's something other PostgreSQL users might find interesting.

In between writing one set of data, and the next which relies on ON CONFLICT to update/insert rows, thus fully relying on the unique index holding the integrity, I switched docker image, to get some tooling built in.

The original was alpine/musl based. The subsequent was Debian/Glib based.

As far as I can tell the byte collation is different and the index operations just didn't find one set of bytes where it ought to be.

If I had dumped/restored - it wouldn't have been a problem, but I just flipped the image on the existing storage volume. oops.

On the surface, the index was active, and in an enforcing state.

a REINDEX failed however, there were dupes!

For me, I fixed the dupes, REINDEXed, then dump-restored.

But worth bearing in mind given how many backup mechanisms rely on storage volume snapshots, and a global reindex after restore will catch these types of issues if that's a potential for anyone.

I hereby invite the forthcoming tsunami of criticism, that I will ignore, purely so i can post this for others to find interest, and who might have done the same thing as me.

1||0 comments

Show HN: A Local-First Agentic Knowledge Manager

by Mapika · 22 minutes ago

13|github.com|0 comments

Stop Using Yarn Classic

by thunderbong · 23 minutes ago

1|charpeni.com|0 comments

As NASA eyes lunar base, there's still much to learn about landing on the Moon

by rbanffy · 23 minutes ago

1|arstechnica.com|0 comments

Show HN: The agent which teaches you while you build

by samagragune · 25 minutes ago

2|contral.ai|0 comments

Happy birthday, David Attenborough Famed naturalist marks 100 years

by yreg · 27 minutes ago

1|www.scientificamerican.com|0 comments

Show HN: Airplane AI – Local NDA Safe AI Powered by Gemma

by franze · 36 minutes ago

1|airplane-ai.franzai.com|0 comments

Shopping for Happiness

by jimsojim · 37 minutes ago

1|putanumonit.com|0 comments

Build the Shared Memory First

by gann_ · 37 minutes ago

1|avwrm-5iaaa-aaaal-qdhcq-cai.icp0.io|0 comments

Show HN: I built a dead simple App Store screenshot maker

by abrowniejr · about 1 hour ago

i actually built this as an internal tool for my own iOS app.

I googled "App store screenshot maker" and the websites i found were super clunky and complicated. 50+ buttons, confusing UX, need to sign up.

so i just built out my own one. it’s plain HTML+CSS+JS - no bloat. html2canvas handles exporting. Cloudflare KV + workers handle caching and backend ops.

3|ezscreenshots.com|1 comments